What If We Spent Less?
Cutting a $2 million programmatic budget to $400,000 without retreating
The programmatic advertising program was spending nearly $2 million annually. The assumption seemed to be that maintaining reach required maintaining the budget.
I was not convinced.
We examined where the money was going
We examined where the money was going, which audiences were responding, and whether the activity was contributing to meaningful business results. Then we began cutting inefficient investment and concentrating the remaining budget where it had a better chance of working.
This was not a minor optimization
This was not a minor optimization. We reduced annual spending to approximately $400,000.
What if a significant portion of the budget was creating activity rather than value?
Spending less forces clarity
Spending less can make marketers nervous. It can look like retreating. In this case, it forced us to become clearer about what we were buying, why we were buying it, and whether it deserved continued investment.
The Newsletter
More Marketing, Apparently?
Marketing lessons, professional guesswork, career perspective, and the occasional observation I probably should have kept to myself.
Keep reading
Related
The Website Started Producing Revenue
A website redesign built around customer decisions instead of internal structure increased website-driven revenue by 40%. Design alone did not do that.
More Content Is Not a Strategy
AI makes producing content easy. That is exactly why volume is no longer a strategy. The advantage now belongs to knowing what is worth saying.
Marketing Always Comes Back to Connection
Tools and channels keep evolving, but marketing's real purpose is still connection. On leadership, AI, and what contracting has unexpectedly taught me.